I don't believe it supports bulk_ca... -- Charles Daminato Life is not holding a good hand; OpenSRS Product Manager Life is playing a poor hand well. Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Danish proverb
> -----Original Message----- > From: POWERHOUSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: January 14, 2003 4:24 PM > To: Charles Daminato; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: .ca Domain Reg... > > > Excellent. I am taking the client and re-writing it into our Web > Application(basically our entire new site), > so the less I have to put from the reg_system the better :o) > > I'll go through it and remove all aspects of the .ca in the > reg_system.cgi. > > Does the new one(ca_reg.cgi) support bulk registering .ca > domains(I have not > yet looked to much through it)? > > Thanks, > Richard. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "POWERHOUSE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:14 PM > Subject: RE: .ca Domain Reg... > > > > We recommend the ca_reg.cgi for .ca purchases, but have left > the existing > > .ca functionality in the current client code to allow resellers to > migrate. > > The ca_reg.cgi is a new component with improved (much!) .ca registration > > process flow and is the best to use. > > > > Shortly we'll be completely removing .ca from reg_system.cgi - > and you can > > disable that as well. > > > > -- > > Charles Daminato Life is not holding a good hand; > > OpenSRS Product Manager Life is playing a poor hand well. > > Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Danish proverb > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of POWERHOUSE > > > Sent: January 14, 2003 4:05 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: .ca Domain Reg... > > > > > > > > > Why does the reg_system.cgi have .ca in the NEW release, plus have the > > > ca_reg.cgi? > > > > > > Can I remove all the .ca functions from the reg_system.cgi and > > > just use the > > > ca_reg.cgi? > > > > > > Or can I just ignore the ca_reg.cgi and just use the > > > reg_system.cgi for the > > > ca registrations? > > > > > > > > > Just trying to figure it out. the reg_system.cgi is a lot to > parse, if I > > > have to leave all the .ca domain > > > stuff in it, PLUS have the other to use. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Richard. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
