I fully support being able to lock all domains.  Esp. .Ca domains, me being
a Canuck and all.

Swerve

> From: Paul Chvostek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:34:57 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Domain Hijacked
> 
> 
> Quoting Doctor PC - Brian O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Does anybody know if any of these whois-archive sites would have logged a
>> change that was only in place for a few hours? Our domain was hijacked last
>> night, but, thankfully, I got it back before any real damage was done. But
>> now I am wondering if there is any proof that the deed was ever done. And
>> if so, how to go about proving it.
> 
> The term "hijacked" is used to mean alot of different things.  If the
> domain in question was "doctorpc.ca", then OpenSRS may be able to tell
> you who logged in to your domain via the management system.  Note that
> any hijacking would most likely involve a "critical" change in CIRA's
> eyes, and so would require confirmation via your admin contact's email
> address.  In my experience, the largest number of "hijacking" incidents
> turn out to be security problems with email addresses.
> 
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 02:02:48PM -0500, Mark Hutchings wrote:
>> 
>> Not off hand, but I had one of our developers make a script that runs a whois
>> every 10 minutes on our domains and uses sendmail to send us an email
>> whenever 
>> anything changes.   Might check into this as a security measure for you and
>> your clients.  There's free ones out there too.  I think there's on as an
>> add-
>> on for webmin.
> 
> This sounds a bit excessive to me.  What if everbody were doing this?
> How much would the registr(ar|ie)s be spending on bandwidth?  Wouldn't
> that translate into higher costs for all of us?
> 
> What I'd like to see is for OpenSRS to provide registry-style locking on
> TLDs that don't currently support it.  CIRA is pretty safe, with the
> critical change confirmation process, but with a "registrar-lock" that
> worked the same way as the registry lock does now (i.e. it gets changed
> only via the RWI or client code), resellers would be able to standardize
> the featureset of their product offering across multiple TLDs.
> 
> Hrm.  Almost sounds like marketing....
> 
> -- 
> Paul Chvostek                                             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Operations / Abuse / Whatever
> it.canada, hosting and development                   http://www.it.ca/
> 

Reply via email to