On 7/10/2012 12:12 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:

The fact that Google put their name on a 7" tablet says one thing:
Google is afraid to go head to head with Apple. If Google wanted an iPad
killer then we'd be looking at Nexus 10 at $279. But that's not what we
have; we have yet another 7" tablet. The only serious competition are
Amazon and B&N. For small values of "serious": Nexus 7 handily beats
Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet which will give Google a solid second place
in the tablet market, albeit a distant second behind Apple.

1. I'm not sure they could do a Nexus 10 at $279, in part because people's expectations of a tablet that size are higher. Aside from the bigger screen (and higher resolution; I think they'll need to do at least 1080p so the screen looks as good as the Nexus 7 screen) and bigger battery to match, a 10" tablet will also need to have more storage, as well as the second camera and SD slot that got left out of the Nexus 7. (Though they might take my suggestion about the Nexus 7 and only include those last two things in the step-up model.) That's sounding more like a $350 product unless Google is willing to actually take a loss rather than merely break even, though it would still undercut the $500 level that comparable tablets sell for now.

(Brief aside about the competition: the screen resolution of the Windows RT-based Microsoft Surface has only been talked about vaguely by Microsoft. I believe that if they come in at anything less than 1080p the product will tank; it just won't look good enough when placed next to a new iPad. MS is clearly trying to position Surface as a premium product with stuff like the VaporMG case; they need a display to match. I suspect the RT-based tablet will flop anyway because the market doesn't need a third OS in that space; the one with full Windows 8 has a chance because it will be seen as a more portable laptop replacement.)

2. ASUS is one of the few modestly successful Android tablet makers in the 10" space. They might not be interested in cannibalizing their own brand, which means Google would need to find another manufacturing partner. Maybe HTC would be interested; they badly need a successful product.

3. Who says that won't be Google's next product?

That approach makes sense to me. First, establish the brand with a product in a space that Apple isn't yet occupying. Later, introduce a brand extension that takes on the iPad more directly.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to