Hi Cor, > Hi Bernard, *, > > Bernhard Dippold wrote (01-10-10 23:20) > > > [BUGS] > > discussions/proposals about *bugs* in LibreOffice > > > > [FEATURES] > > discussions/proposals about new *features* for LibreOffice > > Both are strongly development related. > Core development has found its place on FreeDesktop. > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/ > > Maybe it is enough to have Bugs/Features on one list, DEV@ ? > This would be the place where people discuss features, bugs, proposals.
I wanted to provide a possibility to report bugs and talk about possible features for non-developers. There are some threads about bugs here on the list, and as long as there is no bugzilla enabled with an easy frontend, I think we'll see more of them here. > > Also I think QA@ is a good thing. +1 > > > [L10N] > > for discussions/proposals about *localization* of the product > > > > [WEBSITE] > > for discussions/proposals about the *website*, forums, wiki, IRC etc [WEB] > > > > [MAILING LIST] > > for discussions/proposals about the *mailing lists* structures > > Why not discuss@ ? I'd support the suggestion about [WEB] > > > [NATIVE-LANG] > > discussions/proposals about *native-language* structures [N-L] > > > > [DOCUMENTATION] > > discussions/proposals about the *documentation* of LibreOffice [DOC] > > > > [MARKETING] > > discussions/proposals about *marketing* for The Document Foundation and > > LibreOffice [MKT]? > > > > [GENERAL] > > discussions/proposals about *everything else* > > Why not discuss@ ? just to avoid double naming ;-) When other threads move to different mailing lists, they will not need any tags any more... Best regards Bernhard -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to [email protected] All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
