Hi Christoph, Thorsten, Am Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:10:27 +0200 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
> I do see the "don't irritate non-technical QA people" argument - but > on the other hand I *do* want to get them technically savvy over > time, and pick up the 'smell' on were to invest time, if > <stereotype>Dev A starts to hack on the uno registry code > again</stereotype>. That's how it started for me. I'm still at the very beginning of coding at maybe I'm way to old to ever learn it entirely but I wanted to have some menu points in the Mac Menu of OOo once the Start Center and/or the last window is closed and you only see the menu bar. So I asked Eric Bachard where to look in the code for this menu part and after he told me I began reading that code parts and after some trial and error figured out how to manipulate them. I'm now happy that - at least in LibreOffice Beta - the changes I did are in the build and perhaps even better than I could have done them but it's a starting point. And when you do QA and talk about this on various fairs people come up with ideas and now that I did my first hackings I'm a step further into LibO/OOo. > Building two camps again, I fear, will not yield the kind of > collaborative athmosphere I so clearly envision for QA/Dev - case in > point is one Raphael Bircher, who loudly complains about perceived > problems doing QA in LibO - I want those concerns voiced on a list > were they can be discussed with the devs, not to echo unheard in > some zoo made up for QA. ;) +1 > (I could probably live with a b...@tdf alias, where discussions is > purely about bugs, how to reproduce them, etc - but really, QA is > much more than that) +1 Eric -- ## de.OpenOffice.org - Office für MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows ## Openoffice.org - ich steck mit drin! -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to [email protected] All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
