Hi Thorsten, 2010/10/4 Thorsten Behrens <t...@documentfoundation.org>: > Cor Nouws wrote: >> Also I think QA@ is a good thing. >> > I think I fundamentally disagree on this one - the interface between > QA and Dev is incredibly huge, I'd even venture the proposition that > ideally there's no difference (in core competencies - maybe there is > one in attitude ;)) - at any rate, the chasm between the OpenOffice > project's QA and Dev teams is something I *do not* want to > transplant into our new project. > > Ideally, I want QA folks to take notice if the Devs start debating > details of specific features, and conversely, I want Devs to take > notice of QA talking about specific "problem areas" in the product. > But you should also be aware that there are much qa-people which are doing just testing. These are not so "technical" and wouldn't like to read or even understand the things on the dev-list. And there is much organisational stuff around the testing which wouldn't interest the developers.
Just my 2c Volker -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
