Le 07/10/2010 10:25, Thorsten Behrens a écrit : > Hi, > > as we start to ramp up more infrastructure, I'd like to make > you think about what's crucially needed to do QA for LibreOffice > 3.3. > > First of all, this is what we currently have: > > * a LibreOffice technical list (I'd like to have devs & QA > discussion there): > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > > * a bugtracker - bugs.freedesktop.org for the while > (use > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=ecific&order > =levance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=LibreOffice&content to list all > currently-filed LibreOffice bugs) > > * a wiki (well, soon ;)) > > * the testtool (similar to OpenOffice.org) > > I'd prefer if we do the 3.3 release in a somewhat lightweight > fashion, and add tools as we go (and decide that we need them) - I > know that the OpenOffice.org QA project has things like QATrack, > QUASTe, and TCM - but I wonder which of those pass the test of "we > really need it, and it's worth the effort to duplicate it/set it > up". > > What do you think?
Hi Thorsten, all, I think we need something like TCM to manage manual tests of localisation. I know that Sophie is/was working on a new version of TCM. She should have some good ideas in this matter. Best regards JBF -- Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents. -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to [email protected] All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
