Thorsten Behrens wrote:
I'd prefer if we do the 3.3 release in a somewhat lightweight fashion
As I understood from an earlier message of yours, LibreOffice 3.3 will be heavily based on OOo 3.3 and I thus agree with the "lightweight testing".
the OpenOffice.org QA project has things like QATrack, QUASTe, and TCM - but I wonder which of those pass the test of "we really need it
I actually believe that these are fundamental tools to assess quality of a build, and that insufficient testing could mean that LibreOffice is doomed to be "the nicer but more buggy brother of OOo" forever in the public opinion.
At least, I recommend that new tests are written for any LibreOffice specific functionality, that we have a tool to track them (kind of TCM) and a tool to track releases (QATrack being the natural candidate here).
Regards, Andrea Pescetti. -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to [email protected] All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
