Le 2010-11-19 19:35, NoOp a écrit :
On 11/19/2010 03:26 PM, Sean White wrote:
As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office project
derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their version
numbering system. Wouldn't it be better to start from 1 to reinforce in
peoples minds that we are a separate project.
Not now. The programme is not very different from OpenOffice. As long as
it feels like OpenOffice, I think that calling it "version 1" would be a
throw back in history. Many folks would think they are much better with
OpenOffice... it is at version 3.3, after all.
When (if) a new user interface is developed, then it will be very easy
to sell that the new LibreOffice 1 is an entirely new program.
--
Michel Gagnon
Montréal (Québec, Canada) -- http://mgagnon.net
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to [email protected]
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
