On Nov 21, 2010, at 19:47 , jonathon wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/19/2010 11:26 PM, Sean White wrote: >> why do we still use their version numbering system. > > If version numbers are very different from those used in OOo, then > extensions created for OOo won;t work in LibO, and vice versus.
...and? Is LibO going to upgrade the version number every time OOo does? And only then? I missed Sean White's message, but I have from the beginning wondered why we're using v3.3 beta and not v1 beta. LibO is not OOo. //James -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
