On 5 April 2011 21:08, Steve Edmonds <[email protected]> wrote: > All. > I tend to agree with Mike on many aspects. > We use 12 instances of LO in our business and I support more privately. > I inter-react with an educational institution and others predominantly MO, > our business is mainly LO. > > For a corporation or large entity to adopt LO it must be able to transfer MO > docs well. > I find that probably 90% of MO docs I receive don't open in LO without need > of reformatting,
Before our switch we have the same problems with MO (we had a mixed enviroment with MO 2003 and a couple of MO XP) receiving files with a range from office 97 to 2007. I've found a better formatting aderence now with libreoffice (but maybe is due to the type of documents we use). > a corporation could not tolerate this. I found that LO does > not time save (auto backup) .docs, a corporation would not tolerate that. > LO do autosave, only it do it in a slight different way: I use OOO (and LO now) since version the first version, and even if it crashes I've never loose a single document. E. -- Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better. A.Camus -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
