On 2011-04-06 07:19, Ercole Carpanetto wrote: > On 5 April 2011 21:08, Steve Edmonds <[email protected]> wrote: > >> All. >> I tend to agree with Mike on many aspects. >> We use 12 instances of LO in our business and I support more privately. >> I inter-react with an educational institution and others predominantly MO, >> our business is mainly LO. >> >> For a corporation or large entity to adopt LO it must be able to transfer MO >> docs well. >> I find that probably 90% of MO docs I receive don't open in LO without need >> of reformatting, >> > Before our switch we have the same problems with MO (we had a mixed > enviroment with MO 2003 and a couple of MO XP) receiving files with a > range from office 97 to 2007. I've found a better formatting aderence > now with libreoffice (but maybe is due to the type of documents we > use). > > >> a corporation could not tolerate this. I found that LO does >> not time save (auto backup) .docs, a corporation would not tolerate that. >> >> > LO do autosave, only it do it in a slight different way: I use OOO > (and LO now) since version the first version, and even if it crashes > I've never loose a single document. > > While editing .doc files I have not found any of them to have been auto saved and recoverable. Same with OOO. .odt files have been autosaved, but the autosaving deletes images from my odt files. So for me LO does not have an autosave feature.
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
