Om the basis of the discussions going on at this list, I do share your analysis as expressed in: http://daedaleus.isaachummel.com/2011/05/01/whither-openoffice/
But I wonder/doubt if the view "the LibreOffice community is mired in excessive open source zeal and geek elitism" also applies to the developers who do the real work. Pieter > -----Original Message----- > From: Isaac Hummel [mailto:is...@daedaleus.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 11:12 AM > To: discuss@documentfoundation.org > Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums - A Different Question > > On 05/02/2011 10:49 PM, NoOp wrote: > > Sorry, but I'd have to disagree... > > http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use > > The resources are owned and operated by Oracle. > > > > Whilst http://user.services.openoffice.org may (currently) > tolerate LO > > posts, certainly LO/TDF should prefer to not continue to send > > users/prospective users to OOo properties for support and answers > > regarding LO. Doing so is akin to having OOo send users/prospective > > users to the LO users list for support. > Except that OpenOffice.org has a users mailing list and LO > doesn't have a web forum (and won't set one up in the > foreseeable future, if the discussions about it on these > lists are anything to go by). > > -- > Isaac Hummel > is...@daedaleus.com > http://daedaleus.isaachummel.com > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to > discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Posting guidelines + more: > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and > cannot be deleted > > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
