Why is that a poor picture? I am confident that some users choose Open/LibreOffice distributions for ideological reasons.
I also think many adopt software because they have a need that it satisfies in their use of it in creating and interchanging documents and the FOSS assurance has little meaning for them. It simply is not relevant in their world. What's poor about that? Is it more important that LO be a political weapon than it be useful to people who have work to do? - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Augustine Souza [mailto:aesouza2...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 07:18 To: discuss@documentfoundation.org Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice On 6/15/11, Allen Pulsifer <pulsi...@openoffice.org> wrote: ... > End users do not care about > who's right, who's wrong, who's been slighted, who is more pure, etc. They > just care about products and technologies that are going to meet their > needs. Painting quite a poor picture of end users? Are they really like that? Or do we say so to support our argument? -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
