>
> People who slap NC on their CC'd work on the other hand have the very sound
> understanding that if they didn't do this, nasty, greedy corporations could
> make colossal profits by selling access, or performances, copies, and
> derivatives of their work (despite it being freely copyable).
>

I fully understand why NC exists, but in this case I think it's completely
idiotic. I mean if some horrible greedy corporation wants to make colossal
profits by selling access to the Spark competition video website and videos,
then by all means LET THEM!

If you're trying to sell something in the first place and think you're going
to be edged out of the market by large corporations, then NC *might* make
sense.

--Dean



>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Dean Jansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Friday, 25 July 2008 4:13pm
> *To:* Discussion of Free Culture in general and this organization in
> particular
> *Subject:* Re: [FC-discuss] Sparky Awards video contest
>
>  I assume he means this:
>
> "Copyright, 2008 SPARC, subject to a Creative Commons
> Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 
> License<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/>
> "
>
> and that NC = lame (especially in this case)
>
> That's just my interpretation of the comment though, so who knows.
>
> --Dean
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Nelson Pavlosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Rob Myers wrote:
>> > Rather than comment on the NC failage in this competition I'll just
>> > draw your attention to:
>> >
>> > http://youtube.com/watch?v=iVCGmyRrmUc
>> >
>> > - Rob.
>>
>> What does "NC failage" mean?
>>
>> ~Nelson~
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to