Cutest puppycam video ever, for sure. Per my earlier thread regarding fair use, I'm positively tickled to re-read the Order Denying Motion to Dismiss written by Judge Fogel:
"...in order for a copyright owner to proceed under the DMCA with 'a good faith belief [...],' the owner must evaluate whether the material makes fair use of the copyright." http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/lenz_v_universal/lenzorder082008.pdf Unless there is an army of interns working overtime, it seems reasonable to suspect that Warner Music Group may not be proceeding in "good faith" as they have submitted 1000s of claims to YouTube's Copyright Office each month since December 08. YouTomb stats show that in the first few months of 2009, more than three times as many claims were made than during all of 2008! http://youtomb.mit.edu/blog/?p=32 Thanks again, Kevin On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Ryan Prior <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Kevin Driscoll <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> Anyone have updates on Lenz v. Universal? I haven't heard anything new >> in a few months. > > It bears mentioning that the video > (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1KfJHFWlhQ) is still up and the little guy > is cute as a button. > > Aside from that, you might try contacting Stanford Law and asking if they > are still involved. > >> >> http://www.eff.org/cases/lenz-v-universal >> >> Kevin >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
