Hey Tim, Have you seen screenshots or anything of the content ID backend? I also have the same impression but haven't talked to anyone that is an actualy user.
Kevin On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Tim Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> As I understand it, the Content ID system catalogs potentially >> infringing videos but it is the suggested rights holder who must >> ultimately issue a takedown. > > Well, so, Content ID doesnt just catalog -- it also lets content-owners > choose between a number of automatic actions that can occur when matches are > identified. They can choose to ignore them, to earn secret ad revenue from > them (as WMG was doing until recently) or to mute or remove them altogether > (as WMG started doing in January). These Content ID removals are not formal > DMCA takedown notices. You respond to them using a YouTube "Video ID > Dispute," not a DMCA Counternotice. > > So for yr ROFLcon vid -- can you file a Dispute for it? > http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=83768 > > > Also maybe helpful: > http://www.eff.org/issues/intellectual-property/guide-to-youtube-removals > > > =T= > > > > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
