Fair enough. YouTomb data always represent a subset contingent on our
somewhat arbitrary search criteria.


Kevin


On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Elizabeth Stark <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kevin, I hesitate to quote that stat, as we're not tracking all YT videos,
> and given that the scanner was down for quite a long time in 08. We could
> say "YouTomb tracked 3 times as many claims..." but that still may be
> misleading.
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Kevin Driscoll <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Cutest puppycam video ever, for sure.
>>
>> Per my earlier thread regarding fair use, I'm positively tickled to
>> re-read the Order Denying Motion to Dismiss written by Judge Fogel:
>>
>> "...in order for a copyright owner to proceed under the DMCA with 'a
>> good faith belief [...],' the owner must evaluate whether the material
>> makes fair use of the copyright."
>>
>> http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/lenz_v_universal/lenzorder082008.pdf
>>
>> Unless there is an army of interns working overtime, it seems
>> reasonable to suspect that Warner Music Group may not be proceeding in
>> "good faith" as they have submitted 1000s of claims to YouTube's
>> Copyright Office each month since December 08.
>>
>> YouTomb stats show that in the first few months of 2009, more than
>> three times as many claims were made than during all of 2008!
>> http://youtomb.mit.edu/blog/?p=32
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Ryan Prior <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Kevin Driscoll <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >>
>> >> Anyone have updates on Lenz v. Universal? I haven't heard anything new
>> >> in a few months.
>> >
>> > It bears mentioning that the video
>> > (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1KfJHFWlhQ) is still up and the little
>> > guy
>> > is cute as a button.
>> >
>> > Aside from that, you might try contacting Stanford Law and asking if
>> > they
>> > are still involved.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> http://www.eff.org/cases/lenz-v-universal
>> >>
>> >> Kevin
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Discuss mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Discuss mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to