The point of the question was probably because people have wanted, in the past, to use some effect or application that required moo.fx, but also wanted to use another effect or application that used jquery on the same page. There were conflicts because moo depended on prototype, which conflicted with jquery. As I recall, there were some guides published on how to make prototype an jquery co-habitate.
Since moo doesn't depend on prototype now, the hope was that they _might_ be able to co-exist, but I would recommend just use one or the other. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Resig Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 5:50 PM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] mootools > So basically what you're telling me, John, is that the moo tools are > now available for us JQuery users?!!? Umm... no? MooTools is a completely different library developed by a completely different set of developers who have no relation to jQuery. I suspect that, in some ways, using MooTools and jQuery together would cause a number of conflicts. --John _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/ _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
