Yep, thats exactly was I was trying to understand Clifford. :o) Rey...
Meece, Clifford T wrote: > The point of the question was probably because people have wanted, in > the past, to use some effect or application that required moo.fx, but > also wanted to use another effect or application that used jquery on the > same page. There were conflicts because moo depended on prototype, > which conflicted with jquery. As I recall, there were some guides > published on how to make prototype an jquery co-habitate. > > Since moo doesn't depend on prototype now, the hope was that they > _might_ be able to co-exist, but I would recommend just use one or the > other. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John Resig > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 5:50 PM > To: jQuery Discussion. > Subject: Re: [jQuery] mootools > > >>So basically what you're telling me, John, is that the moo tools are >>now available for us JQuery users?!!? > > > Umm... no? MooTools is a completely different library developed by a > completely different set of developers who have no relation to jQuery. > I suspect that, in some ways, using MooTools and jQuery together would > cause a number of conflicts. > > --John > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
