> I completely and totally disagree with the court in this case. At what point > does it stop? Does my personal blog need to be accessible to the blind? What > if I don't care about them? Why should the courts get involved in this
No, your personal blog doesn't need to be accessible because it does not have a commercial brick and mortar store. Much like government agencies have to follow accessibility in the real world (and are /required/ to do the same on the Web with US 508), commercial entities have the same basic requirements (wheelchair ramp). These laws extending to their commercial entities on the web is not a huge leap to make. > I just think that we're taking things like this a little too far, IMO. > > <!----------------//------ > andy matthews > web developer > certified advanced coldfusion programmer > ICGLink, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 615.370.1530 x737 > --------------//---------> It's "<!-- ", not "<!----- ...", and signatures should be four lines maximum, delimited by "-- \n", not the monstrosity you're using. -- Morbus Iff ( take your rosaries off my ovaries ) Technical: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779 Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/ icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org: morbus _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
