Yehuda Katz schrieb: > One of the nice things about having a *digital* publication is that I > can make these changes :). Expect an updated copy of the Visual jQuery > Magazine in a few days for archival purposes. > > I know about the semantically incorrect XHTML. While you're technically > correct (and I'll make an effort to use valid XHTML in the future), it > doesn't take much away from the point of the article (and assuming the > page rendered, jQuery is capable of grabbing child elements even if > they're bad XHTML).
Hey Yehuda, it is maybe not so much about semantic incorrectness (In XHTML 2 you can put much more things into a paragraph). It's invalid. It wouldn't be well-formed. If one uses XHTML as XML with such HTML you would simply get a yellow error screen (In Firefox at least). -- Klaus _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
