Hi, > but new function() { ... }; is much cleaner, IMO. As far as I know, > that is the "best" way to have a local scope, [...]
We had that before. Deans way to create a local scope ((function() {...})()) is better, because it doesn't create a new Object that you never use. Of course that difference is not too big, but it is there. Also I don't think that new function() {...} is cleaner or better to read. Usually when I read 'new' I expect that a new object is created and I wonder what will be done with it. Christof _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/