> > A suggestion - perhaps you should use 'jQuery' instead of '$' as isn't
> > that the convention for plugin authoring?
> >
> Jörn took care of that and simulated block scope:
>
> (function($) {
>
> ...
>
> })(jQuery);
Aye, another lesson I learned from the great Michael Geary :-)
It allows me to use $ and forces a perfect private scope, with making only the
jQuery method public.
By the way, as nearly no one uses the "convention" for filenaming
(jquery.xxx.js): I think it's time to simply remove it, any objections?
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
--
GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist!
NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
