Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
>>> A suggestion - perhaps you should use 'jQuery' instead of '$' as isn't
>>> that the convention for plugin authoring?
>>>
>> Jörn took care of that and simulated block scope:
>>
>> (function($) {
>>
>> ...
>>
>> })(jQuery);
>
> Aye, another lesson I learned from the great Michael Geary :-)
>
> It allows me to use $ and forces a perfect private scope, with making only
> the jQuery method public.
>
> By the way, as nearly no one uses the "convention" for filenaming
> (jquery.xxx.js): I think it's time to simply remove it, any objections?
I use it for the plugins I offer at stilbuero.de, but in SVN I didn't
adopt that, because all the other plugins didn't either. I'm still for it!
-- Klaus
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
