On 11/15/06, Rik Lomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Without sounding rude, I don't think I would ever use this and I don't > think most developers would either. We need jQuery to be small and > flexible, not a huge bloated framework like some of the other > libraries (that I will leave nameless)... Maybe extending jQuery, or > building a plug-in may be the way round this?
Yes, that would be nice. But currently there is no hook to use custom selectors (other than `:something`, as <http://www.malsup.com/jquery/expr/> demonstrates). For me it's ok if this feature is not in the core as long as it can be used as a plugin. > On 15/11/06, Choan C. Gálvez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/15/06, Brian Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Personally, I'm noticing a lot of requests for XML namespace selection in > > > the parser. Can we get that into 1.1? Apperently, making $('myns:div') > > > would raise holy hell because it would clash with the pseudos, but > > > $('myns|div') might be doable. > > > > +1 for namespace selection. > > > > In one of my current projects, we added custom attributes to form > > elements to use them as widgets. > > > > As jQuery doesn't allow this kind of selection, we were forced to > > invalidate our XHTML. God killed a kitty. > > > > I wouldn't like to do it again. -- Choan <http://choangalvez.nom.es/> _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
