TinyMCE doesn't have built-in image upload. <!----------------//------ andy matthews web developer certified advanced coldfusion programmer ICGLink, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 615.370.1530 x737 --------------//--------->
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen Howard Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 9:12 PM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] Next generation WYSIWYG editor... maybe? am I missing something? I'm all for entheusiasm, but have you looked at tinyMCE? What shortcomings does it have that you are trying to address? http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/ - Stephen Tom Holder wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've been getting increasingly frustrated by the flexibility and > output from all of the WYSIWYG editors available for the web so I want > to try and build an editor experience for our 2nd generation of CMS > that will achieve the following: > > * Integrate in to our sites without requiring CSS tweaks to get it > looking correct - this means no iframes. > * Produce strict XHTML every time without fail. > * Be simple to use. > * Be quick to load and run. > * Limit scope for the user to mess up their site design. > > I want to try and use JQuery to achieve all of the above (and > hopefully a bit more). To see the foundation of my editor have a look at: > > http://www.simpleweb-online.co.uk/stage/editor/test.htm > > Ok, it's very simple indeed, and doesn't actually let you edit > anything!! However, the idea is that you can designate a div as the > 'editor' and then within this you can drop elements (I would imagine > having a drop zone at the bottom?) for example: > > * p tag > * h1-h4 etc > * ul > * image > * definition list > * various other stuff (e.g. a google map) > > Each of these elements would have an associated content editor for it. > For example an h1 would just have a 1 line text box, a p a text area, > an image a number of controls for src, alt, size etc. > > It's my thought at the moment that I will use ajax to save back > updates and re-ordering so that there is essentially no 'save' process. > > Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Perhaps I'm barking up totally > the wrong tree. > > Tom > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/ _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
