Andy Matthews schrieb: > I'd have to agree with everything that Glen says, and I'd add something. > > Instead of just showing how powerful and easy jQuery is to use, why not > show people how it compares to other libraries? > > Pick 5 or 10 things fairly common things, then show the code for each > framework. > > Here's how Prototype does it > Here's how Moo.fx does it > Here's how Dojo does it > etc. > > And make them real world stuff, not just uncommon test cases. Then > people can instantly see that jQuery results in less code, and that it's > easier.
I don't like the idea of such heavy comparison. It could create the idea of like "What kind of problem do these jQuery guys have with all the other libraries", know what I mean? Let jQuery speak for itself. A programmer who has used some of the other libraries will see the difference. And for JavaScript newbies make an example script the JavaScript/DOM way and compare that with a jQuery one-liner. Now that would be impressive. -- Klaus _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
