On 2/28/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: > > as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no sense > > fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen sizes... > > What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for > the viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that from the current > Thickbox without any changes.
He means you can't dpeend on any default viewport size minimum, and TB requires integer sizes in pixels for its size. So what happens when your user is on a 400x400 viewport, and you set thickbox to 600x400? A size specification method that uses percentages instead of pixels would solve this, probably depending on horizontal (yuck) and vertical scrolling inside TB. Dylan _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
