+1 for figshare
The site has an API, and there's various command line tools if you prefer
something git flavored, and they automatically version your data repo when
you make changes.
If you can make your data public or if you have access to an institutional
account then it's free unlimited space.

David Nicholson, Ph.D.
nickledave.github.io
https://github.com/NickleDave
Prinz lab <http://www.biology.emory.edu/research/Prinz/>, Emory University,
Atlanta, GA, USA

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Allen Lee <[email protected]> wrote:

> If these data are an important piece of your computational workflow it
> might make sense to archive & describe them in an actual data repository
> (Dryad, figshare, OSF, etc.) and pull them / cache locally when you run
> your calibration.
>
> --
> Allen Lee
> Associate Research Professional
> Center for Behavior, Institutions, and the Environment
> <http://cbie.asu.edu>
> Network for Computational Modeling in the Social and Ecological Sciences
> <http://comses.net>
> Arizona State University
> Mail Code: 4804
> Tempe, AZ 85287
> *p: *480-727-4646
> *email: *[email protected]
> *web: *https://github.com/alee
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:48 PM thompson.m.j via discuss <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>> I am a member of a computational biology lab that models processes in
>> developmental biology and cell signaling and calibrates these models with
>> microscopy data. I've recently gotten into using version control using git
>> for our codes, and I am now trying to determine the best course of action
>> to take for the data. These are the tools I'm aware of but have not tested:
>>
>> The Dat Project https://datproject.org/
>> Git Large File Storage https://git-lfs.github.com/
>> Git Annex https://git-annex.branchable.com/
>> Data Version Control (DVC) https://dvc.org/
>>
>> All projects seem to be aimed at researchers trying to integrate data
>> versioning into their workflow and collaboration, and some seem to have a
>> few other bells and whistles.
>>
>> Now, the only reason I settled on using git for my work is that it seems
>> to be the de facto standard version control just about the whole world
>> uses. Using this same reasoning, does anyone here have a keen insight into
>> which of the data versioning tools listed here or otherwise is (or will
>> most likely become) the standard for data version control?
>>
> *The Carpentries <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/latest>* / discuss /
> see discussions <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss> +
> participants <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/members> + 
> delivery
> options <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription>
> Permalink
> <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/Tb776978a905c0bf8-M7f55c6036bee6740add39cce>
>

------------------------------------------
The Carpentries: discuss
Permalink: 
https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/Tb776978a905c0bf8-M7bec8b0dbb705610c020040e
Delivery options: https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

Reply via email to