Indeed! It's brilliant - I will from now on use this term also for other
code-along sessions/courses outside of the Carpentries.
  radovan

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:14 PM Erin Becker <[email protected]> wrote:

> I love code-along!
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:19 AM Jeremy Metz via discuss <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for code-along - short but descriptive, and also informal and fun
>> sounding!
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 13:04, Adriana De Palma <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Code-along. As in sing-along. As in fun J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Lex Nederbragt [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> *Sent:* 15 October 2018 12:49
>>> *To:* Discuss list Carpentries <[email protected]>
>>> *Subject:* [discuss] What's in a name: Live-Coding, or?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have for a while been thinking about the term ‘live-coding’ as we use
>>> it as our teaching approach in workshops. What we mean is a form of
>>> teaching described in the instructor training material
>>> <https://carpentries.github.io/instructor-training/15-live/index.html> as
>>> “work[ing] through the lesson material, typing in the code or instructions,
>>> with the workshop participants following along”. But there are other
>>> meanings of the term, for example, some people will ‘live code’ a software
>>> demo during a conference, without the participants doing any coding
>>> themselves. Apparently it even can be done as a performing arts form
>>> (creating sounds, images, etc)- see the wikipedia entry on ‘Live coding'.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am looking for a term that better describes what we do. Examples I
>>> have considered:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -* live follow-along coding*; however, follow-along does not imply
>>> learners being active, they could just as well sit back, relax and follow
>>> along closely (note that the description from the instructor training
>>> material uses this wording also)
>>>
>>> - *live interactive coding*; however, there is not much interaction
>>> unless for any truly *interactive* exercises
>>>
>>> - *live together-coding* or *live collaborative coding*; however, we
>>> are not really coding together or collaboratively, learners merely mirror
>>> the instructor (except for when they do exercises); still, these are
>>> currently my favourites
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any other suggestions?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             Lex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Associate Director, The Carpentries
> Pronouns: she/her/hers
> *The Carpentries <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/latest>* / discuss /
> see discussions <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss> +
> participants <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/members> + 
> delivery
> options <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription>
> Permalink
> <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T69368b0ceffc20b9-M7e3f5f3589e61f3b329fd298>
>

------------------------------------------
The Carpentries: discuss
Permalink: 
https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T69368b0ceffc20b9-Mcc37099c05c25bca7ef2a2ad
Delivery options: https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

Reply via email to