I've never used the profiler you're using. I would think if you're in vmem_hash_delete from there, you must be in the umem implementation of it.
Are you sure it's burning cycles? The way I'm reading the output makes it appear almost negligible. Do you have data from a profiler you _do_ trust? Given the doubt that the one you're using "is working correctly". Are you using umem normally, or do you have any of the debugging features enabled? Are you making allocations that would bypass the quantum cache? (large, I think memalign'd but am not sure, etc.), and would thus send us legitimately down this path even if it _is_ a hog. -- Rich ------------------------------------------- illumos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
