Charlie, I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment. "The value of thinking about Web 2.0 as these three dimensions is that it focuses on three sets of capabilities that define current web capabilities."
I realized that I should have pointed out that Nova's graph should be viewed as having 3 axis, whether that was his intention or not: again - http://tinyurl.com/36byj9 x = social complexity, or as Charlie describes it, the relationship web y = increasing depth of semantic connection, roughly mapping on to what you describe as the 'The Service Web', am I correct in that thinking? z = time, now you describe this as 'The Information Web' I'm inclined to think that based on your description of this part of your piechart that you're looking at what becomes enabled as technology advances, which is based on time. very interesting, thanks for sharing your thoughts, looking forward to the book regards - pauric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=24104 ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
