...so isn't up to UX experts to establish standards? :) It's like any platform that has a number of uses - it's up to the users to use it in an effective way. The idea is that SharePoint has a number features that you don't have to build out of the box (wikis, blogs, discussion board, repositories).
When done right with standardization and a good taxonomy, it's a great tool. When there's no information architecture, it's a poor tool. Just like any other website. Patrick --- From: Todd Zaki Warfel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The main problem with Sharepoint-it's basically a dumping ground. There's no consistent set of standards for organizing stuff in it. So, if you only use one sharepoint site, then great. But in most cases, these people are using multiple sharepoint sites, put together by different people. So, from a usability perspective, it's a guessing game very time. On Jan 17, 2008, at 9:42 PM, Patrick Neeman wrote: Have any of you actually implemented it more than once? Cheers! Todd Zaki Warfel President, Design Researcher Messagefirst | Designing Information. Beautifully. ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
