I think the way Mark started this thread, by couching it in the
strident phrase, "'I am THE designer' and characterizing the
non-team approach as "egocentric" polarizes and greatly
oversimplifies the spectrum of successful approaches found in our
field.

Both "Design by committee" and "Genius (or egocentric) Design"
are polarized, oversimplified strawmen.  These terms and categories
invite people to "take sides," rather than examine carefully and
thoughtfully the complexities, nuances, and overlapping constraints,
approaches, stakeholder balances, and real world messiness that
pervades design and development.

Design by individual or by collaboration need not be hard categories
at war with one another, or claiming the other approach is devoid of
value or potential valid success.  Most designers experience a range
of these approaches, and each has associated skills and situations
and enviroments where each, or a blend with a particular ratio will
work.


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=24799


________________________________________________________________
*Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*
February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA
Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to