woah - great thread. wish i'd read it sooner.

here's my 2cents on ideas about IxD.edu:

We can make a tick list of all the functions we'd like an IxD'er to
have.. but in the end there's something that's learnt by 'doing',
knowledge built out of and around practice... Just about everyone
here has touched on that, but I want to offer something from our
experience here.. (Design programs in Communications and
Architecture&Design schools in .au)

In our University I've seen a few approaches to incorporating design
practice: by far I'm more in favour with the model that Architecture
uses than other ones I've seen.. I'll describe the model I like:

Studio based teaching.. mixing multiple year levels, using people in
practice to lead design studios with questions that bring their
research and practice together.

This is great, not only for the students: practitioners get to keep
the faith & play in "what-if" space that commercial realities might
not afford.. (they also get to work directly with the next gen of
grads before they hit the streets). 

Students love it because it tastes a little like reality, with the
all important possibility for 'failure' (thanks Dave)

[aside: failure (bad word, really) is totally important as an
opportunity to learn]

Studio isn't a panacea though... I'm reminded of a great part in
Kees Dorst's book (Understanding Design) that describes why good
designers often don't make good design teachers (check it out.. but
it's something to do with the way designers like to solve problems,
and teachers like to teach students to solve problems)

This is actually the key issue with edu today, numbers are higher and
the quantity of content is so great that many disciplines are shouting
that they don't have enough time to fit it all in.. some work has
been done around this (Biggs' work on Teaching for Quality Learning,
Ramsden's work on surface vs. deep learning approaches)

Anyway - academicese aside - A major part of any course I'd want to
recommend would have a strong interface people practicing IxD, and
would use a studio model to teach many of the concepts listed
throughout the thread above in the context of practice. 

Hopefully at the same time (eg practitioners taking studios that were
aligned to their interests and subject areas)

hope this makes sense... small form fields can make it difficult to
see your argument ..


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=30515


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to