My 2 cents - the people who chose to not only users to do something that is not allowed by the system, but further codified this little turdblossum (I wonder how much user testing was involved validating this design decision) need electroshock. There are many ways to solve whatever problem space they think they might have had.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Jared Spool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Chauncey Wilson wrote: > > Let see, the usability ethics code restricts electric shock features >> to less than 270 volts and remember that amperage is the more critical >> voltage. >> > > Fortunately, the current administration has made the need for ethics > obsolete. It's no longer a concern. > > > ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
