________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
Hi - I'm working on two similar projects, which are site redesigns of
entire web presences. The common factor between both is that we have
varying ability to alter or change most of the content--or the I/A it
supports. For example, consider redesigning NY Times, but only being
able to affect the main page and some personalization features...but
not the layout, I/A, or presentation of any section like Health,
Finance, etc. Much of this is political, some of it is technical. Some
of the content _is_ unique enough to look and operate differently. But
my question is this... Does anyone have any thoughts or case studies of
a redesign under similar constraints? In particular, I'm interested in:
* Incentives & disincentives to get others to adopt common standards *
Strategies to achieve buy in * Ways to manage expectations about what
is covered in the redesign * Heuristics for determining where to draw
the scope line A lot of this will be, "it depends." I'd really like to
hear "here's what we did, here's what worked, and here's what didn't."
Thanks in advance, Todd
- [IxDA Discuss] Implementing I/A and web strategy when you do... oombrella
