It's an interesting question, Andrei.

I'm not sure I'm prepared to make that prediction yet.

But I would ask, how much do you think this decision is based on purely
strategic considerations, say the dominance of a major competitor in the
browser market. I've read several pieces of analysis which seem to
indicate that Microsoft's Internet Explorer, as the de facto gatekeeper
tool that actually enables people to access Google, has been identified
by them as a strategic obstacle to be overcome. One has to speculate
that said conclusion is part of the decision to release this browser. I
wonder -how- much of that influenced the decision

Or am I being too cynical here?

On the other hand, I think that the ability to sandbox-off webapps, put
them into prizm like dedicated windows, and protect the browser in
general from individual site/app crashes is useful. I don't know that I
agree that Google needs to choose between either browser or app
platform, mostly because an app-platform without a robust browsing
facility would seem very limited. I think they can do both, as they are
trying.

As for success? Who knows. As a Mac user, I've only installed Chrome on
my windows virtual machine. My initial use was very pleasant, and if it
were available on OSX I probably would attempt to use it as my primary
browser in order to see what kinds of UI nits come up.

I can't wait to hear about how other's will feel about daily use of Chrome.

-Damon Dimmic
 User Experience Guy
 SitePen, Inc (Dojo Forever!)
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to