thanks for the input everyone. i think i'm going to move it back to left.. i don't have any great reason for it being right, bar than doing something different.. and i don't think thats a good enough reason alone to break with something that works..
though i totally agree that without challenging convention we wouldn't every innovate. Cheers, Chris On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 7:57 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff) wrote: > > Loren is right. CSS layout allows for a lot of options here. The right > > side won't necessarily drop off first, if a "liquid layout" is used > > specifying widths in percentages. Here's an example of liquid layout, > > if you want one: > > http://tinyurl.com/4p8nwl > > > > Resize the window however you like, and the contents will flex so you > > can adjust it to suit your own preferences. > > > It's easier to do with columns of text, as in the example. Where you have > site that might have a right-hand nav that requires a minimum width to make > sense, a form on the page with other elements where relative positioning is > important, then it's a different ballgame. > > As ever, it's a question of adapting the design to the purpose and the > audience. > > Nick > > ________________________________________________________________ > Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! > To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe > List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines > List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help > ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
