What are you talking about? How can you not measure how a user appreciates gaining a sense of the scope from a global nav?"
This makes perfect sense. What 'SCENT' are you talking about? I didn't know that online links had a 'Scent'. (Your 'minority' comment is a 'fail-safe' for your reputation.) I don't know how you measured that "users appreciated gaining a sense of the scope from the global navigation", Please explain. On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Jared Spool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2008, at 9:06 PM, Paul Eisen wrote: > > There's a general perception that users *want* global navigation, but >>> if you spend any time watching folks on sites, you quickly realize >>> they are *only* interested in local navigation -- how do I get from >>> *here* to *where I want to be*? >>> >> >> So, any effort to add global nav to a page is a senseless waste of >>> >> pixels. >> I don't know how you measured that "users appreciated gaining a sense of >> the scope from the global navigation", but when users are actually *using* a >> site, the #1 way to engender trust is to get them to their target content >> quickly (and make sure that content satiates their needs). >> >> Jared >> >> Jared M. Spool >> User Interface Engineering >> 510 Turnpike St., Suite 102, North Andover, MA 01845 >> e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: +1 978 327 5561 >> http://uie.com Blog: http://uie.com/brainsparks > > ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
