Jared said,

> The Big Assertion: Users are looking for something specific on the site.

>If the user is on the page that has their specific target, then they
> don't need *any* navigation (either local or global).
> If the page they're on doesn't have the target content, then they need
> to find scent (a link with good trigger words) to that content.
> If good, clear local navigation gets them to target content, then they
> don't need any global navigation.

Yes, this makes sense. And as a philosophy it provides good incentive to 
anticipate what they users could possibly be looking for, so the designer can 
provide those options locally. However, often there are just too many things 
the user might want to do, and in my experience it's usually not possible to 
anticipate them all. The designer could set a target of attempting to satisfy 
x% of the navigation needs with local nav (x = 90%? 95% 99%). But for those 
fringe needs, the global nav does provide the backbone to enable the user to 
explore with confidence. Exploring with confidence also offers the advantage of 
serving up options that were not originally considered or "needed" by the user, 
but may offer opportunities for value exchange. So the global nav may help 
squeeze a little extra value out of the site, for those users so motivated.

> I don't know how you measured that "users appreciated gaining a sense
> of the scope from the global navigation"

Users viewed various home-page design styles, one of which provided a 
structured overview of the web site 3 levels deep. Users consistently chose 
this home-page design style over traditional styles (e.g., big hero image, a 
few key links, main nav). Sure, there's the local-nav argument: they could 
drive right where they needed. But their comments were consistent and 
revealing. They pointed to the fact that seeing the full breadth of the scope, 
structured in a way that made sense to them, gave them confidence that the site 
had what they needed, and was comprehensive. Subjective ratings of "trust" were 
highest for this design style, as were reports of the probability that they 
would return.

Paul Eisen
Principal User Experience Architect
tandemseven

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to