To further my position: I was thinking that, based on Deleuze (and
reacting to Kant), that a philosophical concept "posits itself and
its object at the same time as it is created." Which is exactly the
point I think Vander Wal et al were stating in discussions about
identity/object. What can Deleuze tell us about identity and object
within the ecosystem of social mediated networking sites - and
specifically - the IxDA list which is just such a consensual
hallucination (Gibson) of 'being' in space over time? The
philosophy of IxD is best understood as the manufacture of concepts
and more closely resembles practical or artistic production than it
does an adjunct to a definitive scientific description of a
pre-existing methodology (as in the tradition of Locke or Quine).
This has interesting implications for the IxD list in general and
DTDT discussions in particular. This explains, in part, the amount of
effort spent on meta-topics such as UCD/ACD. 

I mean after reviewing the multifarious discussion here, I can't
help but wonder why it so reminded me of Kant's transcendental
idealism - experience (design) only makes sense when organized by
intellectual categories (such as method, tactics, and prototypes). By
the nature of what we do, we immediately fall into this trap, and
perhaps that is limiting. Taking such intellectual concepts out of
the context of experience, according to Kant, spawns seductive but
senseless metaphysical beliefs like ACD might somehow make us better
designers than some other method. Do we think this is really so? 

Following Deleuze, I think we should consider inverting Kant's
arrangement: experience exceeds our concepts by presenting novelty,
and this raw experience of difference actualizes an idea, unfettered
by our prior categories, forcing us to invent new activities, new
ways of considering how we do things like sketch, brainstorm,
prototype as a fulcrum to force an entirely new gestalt on the
interface itself, and perhaps this is where innovation comes from. Or
perhaps not. 

Just my thoughts. 


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=33980


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to