Definitely what I saw too. A slight misinterpretation.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 20, 2009, at 6:36 PM, Robert Hoekman Jr <[email protected]> wrote:
So you think that testing 41 shades of blue or arguing about
borders being
2 to 4 pixels to the point of being asked to prove 2 is better than
4 is a
good thing? That all design decisions should be driven by Google's
insistence on data driven design by committee?
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess you two are having a
communication
problem.
Dan—Andrei meant "Google lost someone because they're obsessed with
testing
every last thing in the world", not "Bowman left for no good reason."
Andrei—Dan misinterpreted what you said and cited Google's testing o
bsession
as a good reason to leave. In other words, you're both saying the same
thing—that Google's obsession caused Bowman to leave, and that it's
a bad
thing.
Eh?
-r-
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
