Ah, I'm finally able to see all the responses! Thanks to the clever
gnomes who make this discussion list work.

My original question was "why isn't the OS a browser," not, "why
can't my browser be the operating system." I think there's a
difference. Several people pointed out that you will always need the
OS to run keyboards, RAM, and other background functions. And at
least for the foreseeable future, memory-intensive programs are
better off running natively. 

But it seems to me there's no reason the whole OS couldn't become a
background application doing those things behind the scenes. Kind of
like the way Windows runs in DOS. 

Hardly anyone remembers that DOS used to be the operating
environment. Now it's completely invisible. Kids growing up with
technology in the coming years aren't going to concern themselves
with memory management, screen redraw speed, devices -- probably not
even physical keyboards. And many of the OS controls Dave mentioned
-- power, security, wireless, user management -- are the sort of
thing you worry about once, when you're walking through the setup
wizard, and then never think of again.

So I do think it's valid to ask whether the average user cares about
the distinction between the OS and the browser and -- if not -- what
can we do to make the experience more transparent. 




. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=45492


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to