>>>>> "Matt" == Matt Simmons <[email protected]> writes:
Matt> I'm not disagreeing with any of your assertions, but if Wikileaks Matt> received the leaked material from an informant, and didn't steal it Matt> themselves, wouldn't the "greater public good" be a possible defense Matt> for them? Possible defense yes, but they don't seem to be playing that angle. And until then, I'm branding them "accessory after the fact". NYTimes, on the other hand, will clearly take that stance. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[email protected]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
