On 2/28/2011 4:34 PM, carlo flores wrote: > 1 GB of mail is certainly fine -- claws-mail managed much more than this on > an old thinkpad x20 (a P3 machine) much faster than I expected. It really > is a wonderful, lightweight program. I still use it happily on this X200 (a > dual core machine).
Good to hear that the volume would be simple (the two machines I use are both pretty recent in hardware, and running fairly lightweight operating systems). > I actually prefer filtering with my various gmail accounts then forwarding a > catch-all gmail account. I understand you've grown to hate it but I'm still > impressed with the mobile gmail's speed and the convenience of one check-in, > multiple from accounts, and so on. I know how to filter already. Actually, I'm planning on moving the tbird accounts over as well, so it's going to be fairly complex to manage. I want less bells and whistles, and GOOG seems to think I want more. I don't use my cell for email (although I do use it almost entirely for SMS, and almost never for voice). I log into each gmail account I have separately, and check all but one of them only once a day. I'm more interested in keeping the email I already have in an archive than in managing more incoming email (except with a couple). > Anyway, I'm a fan of claws-mail and would love to give more feedback, but > I'm not quite sure what information you're looking for... Are you using claws on Ubuntu, or somewhere else? -- Amor fati. Vale. (Seneca) _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
