Hi, 2013/1/16 James R Grinter <[email protected]>: > On 16/01/2013 10:39, Florian Heigl wrote: >> >> I ended up thinking of Jenkins since there's no really powerful >> equivalent to the enterprise batch schedulers like UC4 or $universe. > > > Has anyone tried Run Deck (http://rundeck.org/) yet? > > (and if you have, how does it stack up against Control-M, Maestro, or > Autosys, et al.)
(already spammed James but this is something more substantial now) This image from the docs shows one major problem: http://rundeck.org/docs/figures/fig0001.png Central execution. Instead of distribution a "model" that is just pushed to the remote box and letting them communicate peer-to-peer you have this central box. That means, if it fails you don't get new job runs (not that big a problem) and current jobs will probably not be nicely resumed since their status is most probably lost if their tasks on a certain node complete while the master is gone. Hopefully someone has reallife experience though, and also I wanna add that the same was valid for i.e. Autosys when I last used it (2003?) Florian _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
