Just getting caught up perusing some recent ;login: issues, and ran
across Mark Burgess' article about DevOps[1] in the April 2013 issue.  I
don't remember a discussion of this on this list, but maybe I missed it
or something... Anyways, seems like a good topic of discussion. (FWIW, I
tend to agree with his thoughts, although I'm not sure LOPSA [or SAGE]
was trying to "unionize" anyone...)

Quote:
"Organizations such as SAGE and LOPSA seemed to lose their way, too; by
trying to "unionize" the profession, they effectively sent the message
that sysadmins just felt poorly treated and underrepresented when they
could have led the march to modernize practices and be the heroes of IT
emancipation. In fact, the profession as a whole simply failed to adapt
to the needs of the rapidly expanding IT industry. Perhaps, if sysadmins
had taken on the mantle of responsibility for integrating into business
processes, that might have led to their rising up the pay-scale
automatically. But system administration has remained, for many, an
introverted gaming occupation. Now it needs to become a more disciplined
engineering profession. And history is in danger of repeating itself
with a new generation of junior admins and impatient developers working
with the cloud, or with new scripting frameworks for automation."

Should LOPSA "lead the march" to DevOps? If so, how?


[1] "Is DevOps the Future of Sysadmin? Bemoaning the Failures of the
Sysadmin Profession" ;login: Vol. 38 No. 2 (April 2013), pp 6-7
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to