There's a of value in consistency. At the very least, it seems like the autorelease build should produce (maybe as a follow-on job) a complete javadoc site for OpenDaylight in the normal form just so that we have something people are used to.
--Colin On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> wrote: > On 10/31/2016 07:15 PM, Thanh Ha wrote: > > It's entirely possible to submit static javadoc api pages as sphinx does > > allow for static page publishing but some concerns I have about it (no > > necessary blockers or anything) such as the complexity of having more > > tools in docs than necessary and perhaps yet more jobs in Jenkins but if > > the community prefers the traditional JDK approach we can do it. > > Well, that sphinx output is something I'd prefer not to use. It is a > neat exercise, but way behind in usability when compared to the default > javadoc output. > > Just my .02, > Robert > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.opendaylight.org > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
